Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata
OGS Website BGTA homepage
About the Journal
Contacts
To Authors
Subscriptions
Forthcoming
On-line First
Issues

2012 Vol. 53
1 / 2 / 3 / 4

2011 Vol. 52
1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / Suppl. 1

2010 Vol. 51
1 / 2-3 / 4 / Suppl. 1

2009 Vol. 50
1 / 2 / 3 / 4

2008 Vol. 49
1 / 2 / 3-4

2007 Vol. 48
1 / 2 / 3 / 4

2006 Vol. 47
1-2 / 3 / 4

2005 Vol. 46
1 / 2-3 / 4

2004 Vol. 45
1-2 / 3 / 4 / Suppl. 1 / Suppl. 2

2003 Vol. 44
1 / 2 / 3-4

2002 Vol. 43
1-2 / 3-4

2001 Vol. 42
1-2 / 3-4

2000 Vol. 41
1 / 2 / 3-4

1999 Vol. 40
1 / 2 / 3-4

1998 Vol. 39
1 / 2 / 3 / 4

1997 Vol. 38
1-2 / 3-4

1995 Vol. 37
145 / 146 / 147 / 148 / Suppl. 1

1994 Vol. 36
141-144

1993 Vol. 35
137-138 / 139 / 140

1992 Vol. 34
133 / 134-135 / 136

1991 Vol. 33
129 / 130-131 / 132

 
 

Vol. 45, n.4, December 2004
pp. 247-254

About the statistical validation of probability generators

G. Grandori, E. Guagenti and L. Petrini

Received April 22, 2003; accepted July 22, 2003

Abstract

The procedures that generate probability statements are called probability generators (or simply generators). In this paper, we consider the generators that yield the magnitude distribution function FM in the frame of the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis at a site. From an engineering point of view, the behaviour of FM in the range of strong earthquakes is of decisive importance. In general, however, the statistical validation of a generator in the range of interest is not feasible because of the limited number of occurrences of strong earthquakes. In spite of this, in this paper we show that a simple empirical generator of FM can be statistically validated from an engineering point of view thanks to: 1) a new approach to the comparison between competing generators, and 2) the comparison, following this new approach, of the empirical generator with a particular class of generators based on mathematical models.



back to table of contents